For their tenacious maintenance of superior cow breeds in the teeth of Government onslaught, hinderances & handicaps during last 100 years.
This thesis attempts to bring out the most important phase of the basic Indian economy thrown overboard in its stride by the frenzied industrial tempo. Let me state clearly that I am not against industry but most emphatically insist that all industrial development must be in consonance and in conformity with the herein discussed basic Indian economy. Industry should support and not distort this basic cow economy of the country.
Chapter 1 – Introduction
Chapter 2 – Farming
Chapter 3 – Transport
Chapter 4 – Nourishment
Chapter 5 – Fuel
Chapter 6 – Housing
Chapter 7 – Fodder
Chapter 8 – Defence
Chapter 9 – Effects (not yet available)
Chapter 10 – Answer (not yet available)
The cow is the foundation of one of the greatest economies in the world. It is forgotten that the Hindu Religion, the Hindu Culture and the Indian Life are woven around the cow, and in consequence protagonists of cow-slaughter ban are dubbed religious fanatics, communalists and reactionaries by the foreign and the Indian vested interests whose vigorous propaganda has created an atmosphere of scepticism in the country, clouding the real issue. And yet the stormy scenes witnessed in New Delhi on 7th November, 1966 and the fasts of the Jagatguru Shankaracharya have aroused considerable interest in the world. A truthful picture of the issue may help those interested but the aim here is to bring the truth to the notice of the leadership of the country who should with a free mind study and consider the full implications of the issue discussed. Also the notice of the youths of the day is sought to be attracted to this basic factor of the Indian life for it is these youths and their progeny who will have to face the disaster envisaged on account of the cow slaughter.
Here it should be noted that the agitation for cow slaughter ban was not an election stunt; in fact a complete cow slaughter ban has been advocated from earlier periods of the British Rule as far back as 1857. Late Sheth Shri Goculdas, the pioneer of the famous house of Morarji Goculdas appealed to the British Government to enforce a cow slaughter ban. His son Sheth Morarji Goculdas did plan to go to England and agitate for the cow slaughter ban but unfortunately his early death foiled the plan. Thereafter his son, Sheth Narottam Morarji undertook his father’s mission and did present a case to the British Government in London. And throughout in the subsequent years this demand has persisted through different persons and institutions all over the country. Shree Jivadaya Mandli of Bombay has always worked for the implementation of the cow slaughter ban and its Hon. Secretary Shri Jayantilal Mankar has devoted his life to this cause.
To appreciate in full all the aspects of the issue, we have to go deep into the past. Here one point in respect of Hinduism needs be borne in mind, namely, that Hinduism as a religion is perhaps the most practical and earth-bound, i.e. material religion so far as material life is concerned as it is highly idealistic in respect of spiritual aspects. For centuries downwards our country’s economy is cow based, carrying on farming and transport with bullocks. and obtaining nourishing food from cow. So old thinkers placed the cow on a high religious pedestal to provide adequate protection to the cow and thereby to the economy This Essay attempts to bring to the notice of the people the basic facts of the cow economy which has so far been disregarded.
The total area of our country is 32.6 crore hectares having East to West distance of 2977 km. and North to South span of 3219 km. A population of nearly 50 crores is spread over this vast area. Of this 82% Is in 666878 villages, nearly half of these villages having less than 500 persons. And of course It Is this rural area that does the farming and so supports the cow. In the centuries-old cow economy of this country, nearly all basic necessities of life were woven around the pivotal cow. These are:
1) Farming and manure
2) Food and nourishment
5) Housing and
6) Medicinal usage.
We have nearly 40 crore acres under the crop. To switch this area over to mechanised farming, we shall need five million tractors against which we have today only a meagre 31000. To make these tractors we will need 30 mm. tons of steel and our annual production of steel is 4.5 min. tons. And as we have during the last 20 years made 12000 locomotives, 0.6 min. trucks and automobiles, what a long span of time shall we need to make the needed five million tractors? even if we make these alone? And from where the capital estimated to be Rs. 14000 crores has to be raised. The annual depreciation of Rs. 1400 crores apart from the required spare parts (capital and steel for these) and the astronomical diesel consumption needs to be accounted for to get the complete picture of the Tractor Farming Fantasy. Instead of bringing about this situation by continuous cow-slaughter, would it not be more advisable, economic and in the national interest to export steel and to earn foreign exchange?
The problem of farming does not solve itself by employing 5 ml. tractors at the cost afore-estimated. No cow, no manure. So we shall need to make fertilizers. Our annual needs would be .40 min. tons (against our fourth Plan target of 1.6 min. tons) of different fertilizers. Please add the capital and other investments to the tractor production. Of course the fertilisers will have to be transported all over the country and in given time. Our vast country of 566878 villages has 6800 railway stations, 58300 km. of railway, 23818 km. of high ways and 283680 km. of surfaced roads with 219933 trucks to ply over the roads How are we going to make up for the transport of the fertilisers in proper seasonal time? Obviously, the effort will involve further, capital investments, further steel consumption and so on. Go on adding these to the tractor production programme.
To meet this food shortage, the Government have built many dams. More than Rs. 15000 crores have been spent on these dams (I do not say invested for this has proved only to be expenditure and without any tangible benefit to the nation except power to the benefit of the aforesaid capitalist monopoly) but there has been reduction in food production instead of the promised increase.
In this situation we have to decide whether we should invite national destitution by slaughtering the cow or promote prosperity by improvement and increase of cattle.
To maintain high fertility of our soil and to meet our other requirements of health, transport fuel, etc., we need 630 min. cattle as against our present wealth of only 170 min. heads and it is this cattle shortage that lies at the root of our famine conditions, shortage, unemployment, rural exodus, daily rising costs and under-nourished health.
Let us see how cow slaughter has contributed to our spiraling costs and unemployment. Unlimited slaughter of cattle and imported economic policies of the Government have brought about a steep price rise as can be seen from the table A.
|TABLE – A|
|I N T H E Y E A R|
|Kadab per Md.||As.4||Re.1||Rs2||Rs.6-10||Rs.15-20||Rs.20-40|
|Grass 1000 lb.||—||Rs.3||Rs.6||Rs.45-85||Rs.125-185||Rs.200-500|
|Cotton sed Md.||As.4||As.8||Re.1||Rs.15||Rs.20-25||Rs.100-300|
|Wheat Md.||As.8||Rs.150||Rs.2||Rs 15||Rs.20-40||Rs.80-160|
|Edible Oil Md.||–||Rs.2.50||Rs.3.50||Rs.30||Rs.10O-120||Rs.1000-1500|
And U.S.A. Is very anxious to help to supply modern machinery to slaughter these two lakh cows per day and unburden us of the cow liability. This foreign and the indigenous experts and their advices smack of vested interests and pose the greatest danger to the nation, an unprecedented one, directed to create complete dependence on the foreign food supply.
On account of the bullock and the manure shortage, our food production per acre Is diminished by stages on one hand and on the other hand, because of the ghee and milk shortage cereal consumption increased. The Imbalance between consumption and supply thus created. resulted In higher and higher prices. An accepted principle of economy is that when food prices rise all other things and commodities start up the price ladder. It is argued that our population increase is the cause of the price rise, but it is not correct. If population increase is 50% than land under cereal production is increased by 100% which should mean more and cheaper food supply and if there is no export; surely the imports would not become necessary. Our foodgrain imports are multiplying every year Last twenty years have seen this increase by 1000 per cent and yet different parts of the country are falling in the clutches of famine and price of food grain and on its account of other commodities are rising In tidal waves, In reality the doom of our agriculture is solely on account of our reckless slaughter of the cattle wealth.
Our Ministers and industrialists falsely daydream that our agriculture can take huge strides by establishing scientific fertilizer plants. Our 400 min. acres under agriculture will need (every season) 40 mln. tons of fertiliser. To produce these 40 mln. tons of fertiiisers annually, how many billions of rupees will be needed? One fertiliser factory established in 1946 with a capital of As. 7 crores is manufacturing about 2,75.000 tons of fertilizers annually. On this basis, capital requirements to meet our 40 mln. tons needs may be estimated. Further, the use of these fertiliser costs Rs. 90.00 per acre while the food grain produce attained is only 15 mds. meaning an additional expense of As. 6.00 per md. of foodgrain. And by these fertilisers the agriculture is extra-burdened by As. 36,000 min. Can the farmer bear the burden?
And though in the final stage, the burden is passed on to the consumer from where would the farmer produce this fantastic amount even before crop is sown? A further danger to this Impracticable fertilizer idea is its monopoly either in the hands of few foreign and indigenous capitalists or in the hands of the State Governments. Apart from all these, the fact remains that in spite of all the scientific fertilisers, manure is indispensable. Manure is needed to obtain effects of fertilisers. Ten cartloads of manure per acre has to be used prior to the use of the fertilisers. Therefore even taking for granted that all problems in respect of the production and distribution of the scientific fertilisers are solved and these are delivered at the door of the farmers in the desired time, the fact remains that if manure is not available, the entire labour is lost and the fertilizer remains useless.
So it will be seen that if being misguided on advice of the foreign and the indigenous vested interests, we slaughter our cows treating them unproductive (American Bell Commission advises slaughter of the 80% cows) we shall left without manure and all our investments and labour for fertiliser manufacture will be in vain. The country will for centuries not come out of the most unhappy and disastrous era. Further the use of scientific fertilisers needs increased use of water. We cannot provide this. Even after spending As. 1,500 crore on dams, 26% of our population semi-starves for water. On what basis then can we expect to provide the additional water supply to our 400 min. acres necessitated on account of the use of the fertilisers? There are many instances where adequate use only of manure and well ploughed land and no scientific fertilisers at all have yielded 50 to 70 mds. of grain in our country while scientifically advanced countries like America and Russia with fertiliser are not getting more than 15 md yield per acre though we hear loud praises about over abundance of their crops. Does it stand to sanity and justice that we should sink billions in fertiliser plants; burden our lank transport by further 14% and load agriculture with Rs.3600 crores of added cost solely because we are advised that the cow is unproductive and so be slaughtered. instead of going into all this unending labyrinth of problems; why not feed the so-called unproductive cow at a negligible – completely indigenous cot and in return receive milk, ghee, manure and bullocks, even of negligible value. This way seems more sane and in the interests of the country.
The U.S.A. uses scientific fertilisers; but it has to use manure and probably short supply of manures enforces the use of fertilisers as additive, for their cattle wealth is limited. However, the adverse effect of the excessive use of scientific fertilisers is now being felt in their output as also on the produce. Their crop yield per acre is in no way more than the Indian acre, while the quality of their foodgrain is much inferior to its Indian prototype. Compare their red wheat with our Khandva or Pisi and their red Jowar with our white Jowar. It seems sensible that the inferior foodgrain we receive from America are not specially grown for us but it is the only quality produced there and what they eat is sold to us. Both the U.S.A. and India have nearly the same acre-age under agriculture and produce 100 mln. tons each but because of their population being a third of that of India, the U.S.A. has food surplus. Further their daily diet has a very high content of milk products adding to the exportable surplus. After 1947. the agriculture cost in the U.S.A. has risen by 35%. Progressive mechanisation of the agriculture progressively increased the output costs and deteriorated the quality. We should not remain under a false impression about the vastness or prosperity of their agriculture. If U.S.A. would not increase their cattle wealth on a very large scale, they would never have cheaper or larger foodgrain output. Higher production per acre is the headache for U.S.A. while that Russia is to become self sufficient. lnspite of this fact both these countries boast of improving our agriculture and alleviating our distress. Not only foodgrains produced with manure are definitely superior in quality but also are more resistant to roting. Our foodgrains last for years while the American varieties rot in a few months.
Here it would be worthwhile to assess the part played by the cow in food preservation. To establish a buffer stock of foodgrains is the permanent post-independent head-ache of the Government. To meet famine conditions and provide against war-time contingency, a buffer stock of about 20 mln. tons should regularly be maintained. To preserve this stock the use of poisonous insecticides and pesticides and air conditioned godowns are prescribed. And even after these huge costs the results obtained, are far below expectations. The cheapest and most secure method of food preservation is to mix weight by weight the cowdung ash with foodgrains and store it in containers. Cowdung ash is insecticidal and germicidal, and moreover it absorbs moisture. If sufficient number of cows is available in the country and if rationing and controls are removed, people would store two years requirements in this manner. Fifty years back foodgrains were preserved in this way. What the Government could not achieve in twenty years the people will achieve in two years.
Irrigation by huge dams is a folly. Wells are the only answer. But are we to fit pumps to these wells? Or KOSH (leather water lifter)? If use pumps, we would need 20 mln. engines and 20 min. engine rooms. These engine rooms would eat away fully our entire years cement production as also iron sheets and steel in huge tonnage. And we are miserably short of all these commodities. Moreover all these costs would be on farm produce. Now if we propose to use bullock-drawn Kosh (leather water lifters) for water drawing, no extra costs are added. The bullock will plough and irrigate the land, carry loads and give manure. Mechanised farming involving tractors, motors and pumps, fertilizers and trucks for transport would add very heavily to the costs so that the farmer will never be able to sell his products below the present prices and people can never hope for a relieved and easy life.
Slaughter your cow, and your bullock supply is slaughtered.. Neither trucks nor railways can be built up to replace this transport for obvious economic and technical reasons, roads and so on. Even if we plan and carry out the mechanised transport (a remote possibility) would our farmer be able to bear the cost of such transport? Instead, if we only export the diesel only expected to be consumed in such eventuality (of total mechanised transport) we will earn enough foreign exchange. Instead of adopting the right way if we slaughter our cattle which actually are much lesser than required, we have no alternative but to face a nationwide unprecedented famine and chaos.
Let us examine further the price on account of cow and bullock shortage. A farmer grows food in his field If he has bullocks he would bring his produce to city in his cart and therein he incurs no extra expenses. But once we slaughtered bullocks, his produce has to be transported by truck and of course the cost thereof, resulting in higher price of his produce, will be borne. Ultimately by the Consumer Price-rise results, and transport by trucks would at every stage go on adding to the costs so that the farmer can never sell his produce below the present rates and the poor millions ground in the price mill may never hope for a respite and for an easy and ample life. This is not imagination, it is a fact based on careful study.
As we have seen our agriculture depends upon the cattle and its removal does not seem possible even in distant future. Our food supply from ploughing of the field to the delivery of grain
A pregnant mother has to have milk. In cities owing to short supply of milk, calcium can be injected, but what will be the plight of 82% village population’ There are no injections, no doctors and no nurses. And these people have no money to buy injections and to pay for doctors’ services even if these could be available. For them milk is the only valuable source of nourishment. The health of the country, already deteriorated, would be racked to pieces. We have seen the milk requirements of other nations’ and there seems no sense in disregarding their cows and depriving our children and mothers and sick of this precious and sole nourishing food.
We should fix minimum per capital requirements of foodgrains, nourishment, clothing and housing and should see that this minimum is maintained. Otherwise the Independence is of no avail to the common man. Per capital American consumption of nourishing food is one ounce of butter and 1 ½ ounces of fat. Fatty foods are essential to body and insufficient quantities open the door to many diseases. Against the American nourishment standard if we accept only half the quantity, we need half an ounce of ghee or Vanaspati Ghee and one ounce of vegetable oil.
Provision of half an ounce ghee per capita would need 19 min. cows only for this purpose. (on estimation of 10 lb milk per cow). These 19 mln. cows would mature 3.8 mln. acres of land to yield 76 min. tons of jowar and bajri and the stalk of these corn plants would well feed these cows. The by product, butter milk would be 380 mln. lbs. Both ghee and butter milk would save 2 ounces of foodgrain per man. This health giving butter milk would reduce the incidence of sickness and illness.
Now instead of pure ghee, if we were to provide Vanaspati ghee the requirement would be 255 mln. ounces or 6975 tons per day. Today we produce 1000 tons. (Here we do not propose to go into its demerits on human health and consider it only from its economic aspects). Our dehusked groundnut production is 4 min. tons which quantity if fully crushed would give 1 .6 mln. tons of oil. (Of course we do not crush entire production of groundnut). To get this daily production of 1000 tons of vegetable ghee we use 375000 tons of the oil annually. To get daily 6975 tons of vanaspati we would need 2.6 mln. tons of oil annually. For this purpose only 9.7 min. tons of groundnut will have to be harvested and the area under groundnut crop will have to be increased six times. The result would be so much less acreage for foodgrains. The loss of foodgrains on account of this sixfold acreage under groundnut would be of such a magnitude that the deficit cannot be made up with any large scale means of whatever nature. Then again the transport problem arise. These 9.7 mln. tons of ground have to be transported from fields to oil mills and more than two and a half min. tons of vegetable ghee to be returned to villages. This would further load our already over burdened poor transport means to a cracking point. Above all these vanaspati supplies will be monopolised into say, a few capitalist hands, and the entire nation would be at their mercy as to the prices they would extort from the people. The profits of these 2.5 mln. tons of vanaspati will be shared by only these few capitalists whereas the distribution of the profits of pure ghee will be amongst more than one Iakh MALDHARIS. Decentralisation of the production of ghee between these one lakh people would doubtlessly be a curb to any price rise by them for hoarding would be beyond their reach. Further, because of production being in the consuming areas themselves the transport has not to carry extra burden. Also one Iakh of the Indian citizens would earn their bread in an honourable way out of the ghee production as against a few hundred employed in the vanaspati ghee industry. Industry is for people and not people for industry. Vegetable ghee factories’ uproar of loss of investment should be ignored and the factories be scrapped if other uses cannot be found.
There are a few instances to show that the cow slaughter brings about price rise while cow protection and propagation would actually and effectively counter act it as also bring ease in life of people. To put it in a nutshell, pure ghee is socialism, while, vegetable ghee is capitalism. Moreover it is obvious how pure ghee production instills healthy national economy while how the vanaspati production gnaws at the very core of the national life.
Now let us consider edible oil. One ounce per head per day would need 52,00,000 tons of oil. Industrial requirements are not included in this figure. This quantity of oil would need crushing of 12 min. tons of groundnut, which if crushed at mills would involve transport to cities and back resulting in added cost to consumers and added load on transport means. More damaging to the consumer interest would be the resulting monopoly in hands of the few hundreds industrial crushers, and these wealthy gentlemen by whatever means would keep the prices higher, the Government remaining helpless, onlooker and people being stripped. In some areas artificial shortage may be created by hoarding resorted to by these speculators while in others by zonal restrictions. This is happening today. The profits of the entire oil industry will flow to the bulging coffers of these few hundred individuals exploiting the common man. How do we reconcile this aspect with our avowed socialistic pattern of the society? Further elaboration on oil prices does not become necessary for the fact that people of all the States have experienced to their cost that in spite of lakhs dt tons of oil production and despite the fact that about 50 per cent of the people cannot afford to buy oil, the prices are soaring higher and higher and one or the other state is always in the grip of oil shortage.
If this situation is to be counter-acted effectively and the prices of oil have to be brought down, we shall have to seek the assistance of the bullock. Gandhiji always preached that production of a commodity should be in the area it is consumed. The entire produce of oil seeds should be crushed in the traditional Bullock-ghani, in the areas in which It is consumed. Each village should have sufficient ghanis in proportion to the local consumption of crop. Having fulfilled the local requirements, the surplus should be carried by bullock carts to the nearby cities. This would put an end to hoarding, by decentralization of production and distribution through small traders and so would check price rise. Such production and distribution would reduce adulteration to the minimum and provide earning to the lakhs of ghaniwalas and small traders and the profits that the vat oil industry Is pocketing would be distributed among these lakhs; instead of among the few millionaires.
This switch over to ghani would need 6,70,000 ghanis and 13,40,000 bullocks, apart from those required for the transport. Mechanised oil crushing has gifted us with artificial speculative hoardings and resultant shortages, zones, tax evasion, price rise, and such harmful legacies; whereas bullock-oriented industry would lower prices, provide living and employment to millions, create a fair distribution of the commodity, and distribute the profits amongst the people reducing their economic and mental strains.
If on account of the cow-oriented economy, the people were to get cheaper and better foodgrains, sufficient ghee, milk and buttermilk, oil etc., their life would be easier and ample and free from worry and their health would improve adding to their capacity for work. As a by-product the drugs and medicines thus saved can be exported.
Life needs cooked food. For 82% population of India in villages, kerosene gas or electricity is neither available nor within the villager’s means. For them the only economic and easily available fuel is cow dung cakes and firewood. Gas, electricity, kerosene and coal are costly and in difficult supply in cities. The situation in the rural districts is still more difficult. Possible 75% of the villagers may not have seen most of these. To them the only available fuel is cow dung cakes. Before slaughtering cows, we should think in what untenable position these 82% will be placed into.
Insignificant though this problem would appear at first, its ramifications are nearly attaining nation wide grave complexities. If appropriate steps are not taken in time, the day may not be far when imports of bread and biscuits would be necessitated for want of fuel to cook. We have six types of fuel available, namely, electricity, gas, kerosene, coal, wood and cow dung. Electricity and gas are city luxuries because we have no means to plan these within the reach of the 566888 villages and huts. Even if these were possible from where would the villager meet its costs; when for him to get two meals a day is a problem? In cities like Bombay kerosene supplies are short so that eight hours queues is a day-to-day affair then, from where are we to feed these villages? To most of the villagers kerosene even for night lamp is not available and they go without night lamps.
Thoughtless use of wood and coal as fuel has result in depletion of jungles,; producing water shortage.
River bed filled by falling river banks denuded of trees shallows and dries rivers, causing both water and wood shortages. We are at the dangerous juncture where if we do not develop our jungles the entire country would turn into a desert.
This leaves us with cow-dung cakes. Easily available, of this we can meet the demand if simply the cow population is increased. For such fuel requirements we would further need 80 m. cows, and if these cows were to give us 5 lbs. of milk, a lb. per capital supply can be assured. This milk supply would save 2 ounces of foodgrains per head, annual saving being 8.55 m. tons. Cow-dung cake ash becomes a very good fertilizer.”
Villagers having lost their independent small trades and professions as a result of mechanisation, to escape from the increasing grip of shortages created by rationing, zonal restrictions and controls, rush to cities to earn bread. In the cities their only resort is footpath, a life-hell. We dumbly witness this tragic downfall of the Indian culture and religion. Nobody says a word against this. Nobody seems to have an answer to this most uncouth and degrading predicament of human life settlement of this ocean of human beings has to be found. Deprived of any human facilities, their children either succumb to many sicknesses or, if they survive they add, to the growing anti-social elements. If this process is not checked in time a large section of such anti-social roughs will form in the society endangering the very existence of the cultured and good and the entire Indian culture and religions would face extinction. At such a stage, this internal devouring monster would get beyond all control.
There is only one answer to this: a nationwide earnest for adoption of the cow based economy at all government levels and its serious implementation with a view to return this vast millions to the villages, providing them housing and employment.
At the time of building of the Bhakra-Nangal Dam, the Government proudly announced that the Aryans of Rigveda times did not know even to build a house where today a dam of the vast magnitude is built. The officials seem to have only heard the name of Rigveda. Even a volume may not have passed under their eye. Therefore how would they know that the Rigveda describes five types of houses, in detail. namely, those of stone, of bricks, of wood and bamboos, of cow-dung and mud and of tree leaves. Choice of housing should be in consideration of time, financial reach of the people concerned, the circumstances and climate. Our cement production is tar below to suffice buildings for all the required houses. Nor can people afford cement built houses. Of the annual one crore ton cement production half has to go for defence purposes. Cement shortage impeded defence constructions of Rommel, enabling Montgomery to break through the German lines in one onslaught. Therefore defence requirements have to be met on priority. A large bulk of the balance would be consumed in large houses and roads, and industries, leaving a negligible surplus for people’s small dwellings. Are we to allow these unhappy millions to rot on footpath and gutters for the next fifty years? And where is the guarantee that at the end of the fifty years the cement supply would meet total requirements of people’s dwellings?
Therefore we should adopt the practical and sensible way of providing cow dung-cum-mud dwellings. more suited to the climate, necessities, circumstances and most important to the finances of the people of our country. Cement structures demand repairs in about five years time while the garmati, dwellings need a fresh wash with the dung and earth carried out by the owner involving no monetary expenses. Two to three hundred years old structures of this combination of clay and cow-dung survive today.
It is seen that even the housing problem can easily be solved with the help of cow. Villagers do not get dung on account of the cow slaughter and so cottages are also not available to them. Housing requirements of the country is 9.3 min. in cities and 56.1 min. In the rural area. To provide one room dwellings to the villages only would need 170 min. tons of cement and our annual cement production is only 10 min. tons. We cannot wait for generations to build cement structures. This mud-dung dwellings would require dung of 6.30 mln. cows and with this the entire rural housing requirements can be met and comfortably solved.
The difficulty experienced in feeding cows is due to the fact that our agriculture is industry-oriented and not food oriented, which means that instead of meeting human needs, the agricultural priorities are made to serve industrial needs. For example, groundnut is sown in 2.40 crores of acres, yielding 16 lakh tons of oil. To get, this 16 lakh tons of oil til sowing needs only 60 lakh acres. But til oil cannot be converted into vegetable ghee. Therefore, til is neglected by the farmer because the industrial consumer, the vanaspati ghee manufacturer would not buy this, as also the farmer is encouraged by the Government to produce groundnut. In fact til sowing would not only create a surplus of 1 .8 crore acres of land for foodgrains, amounting to 45 lakh tons of excess food, but would benefit soil, it not being deteriorated as in the case of groundnut cultivation. Further, til-oil-cake is the best food for cattle. In India rice eaters are about 16 crores as against 32 crores of wheat eaters. For this wheat eating population 8 crores tons of wheat plus a further stock of 3 crores tons for famine and war contingencies, totaling to 11 crores of tons has to be provided for. To meet this tonnage, 16 crores acres have to be under wheat (our present land under cultivation cover 40 crore acres). There is no alternative but to achieve the target. Huge dams and fertilizer factories have, instead of helping towards this target, actually retarded the progress. Therefore 16cr. acres should be allotted for wheat sowing only. Of these 32 crores wheat-eaters about 6 crore are Jowar eaters, 3 crore Bajri eaters and 5 crore maize eaters. Now jowar, bajri and maize are kharitf crops while wheat is a Rabbi crop. Khariff crops will yield 5 crore tons of food grains alongwith 140 crore tons of kadab (stalks). Immediately on harvesting kharif crops gadab should be sown yielding 100 cr. tons. This gadab is also a good fodder and dried gadab is a good fertiliser. The same land can then be utilised for wheat sowing, yielding 5 crores tons of wheat.
Sixty-three crores cows will need 175 crore tons of grass and sowing jowar and bajri only we get a grass yield in excess of this need. Further by developing graze fallow lands an additional 100-150 crore tons of grass can be made available. If the people’s need of one ounce edible oil is met 6.25 crore tons of oil-cake would be available. Twenty-six Iakh tons of cotton seed is produced, lakhs of tons of jowar is produced and having procured sufficient manure and bullock supply for farming our foodgrain production would rise threefold. With such huge food production the cattle fodder does not remain a problem at all. As a matter of fact we would have fodder in surplus. Along with this, because of superior quality, world markets would willingly pay higher prices for our foodgrains. To achieve this, first of all vegetable ghee production should be totally banned. On our agriculture, cattle and the social economy vegetable ghee has deadlier effect than even atom bombs.
AICC held in Ahmedabad under the presidentship of Late Shri Purshottamdas Tandon passed a resolution to ban completely production, sales, imports and exports of vegetable ghee. This step was in the right direction but for whatever reasons it was never enforced.
The figures above should satisfy the reader that cattle feeding is not a problem at all for us but if we do not completely stop the slaughter of the cow progeny our already difficult food problem would aggravate into the question ‘What will men eat?’ and our rulers will recommend meat and fish eating duly supported by foreign experts; inspite of the fact that fish diet accelerates population growth.
Today we have only two alternatives: Prosper through propagation and development and improvement of cattle, OR destroy cattle and perish yourself.
The temptation to atom-bomb Bombay, Calcutta, Ahmedabad and Kanpur is very difficult for the enemy to resist but what would he benefit by bombarding villages in the rural vast? No power would be foolish enough to squander away atom bombs on villages to destroy meager life and few huts. The atomic armour of both Russia and USA deters each against the other. But China fears none. Russia forced the British retreat on Suez Canal by atom bomb threat in one warning but neither of the top atomic powers have been able to impose even a streak of fear in China because the Chinese strength lies not in her heavy industries but in her multitudes. China cannot be defeated by bombardment of cities like Peking and Shanghi. Her strength lies in smooth functioning of her decentralised industrial and agricultural unit, the village. Both the USA and Russia avoid direct war with China because despite the destruction of cities, these units will function, war will drag on and it will be very very long time before it can be won. Japan could not conquer China for years despite her quick occupation of Peking and Naking, because the Chinese power was decentralised in her villages, and defeat and destruction of each village the Japanese could not achieve. An identical situation persists in Vietnam. Tiny Vietnam combats huge American armies for years, for her strength lies in her jungles, in her marshy lands and in her population distributed in small units. Dependence on heavy industries would have brought Vietnam to its knees at a much earlier stage of the war. Boasting of no large industries this tiny Vietnam has during last two and half decades faced, Japan, routed France and now baffles the USA.
We have two alternatives, namely to develop large scale heavy industries, make atom bomb and starve and become debtors by billions, (a further load would be inevitable to accomplish this in addition to the resulting agricultural recession) OR create such conditions that the enemy would have no temptation or inclination to atom bomb us. My reasoning may not appeal at present but when two of our neighbours would poise for invasion our remorse will know no bounds.
Pakistani disturbance on the Kutch borders affected our transport line, so that wagons for commercial uses were difficult to get. What would happen if both the eastern and the Western borders were afire? All our mechanised transport would have to be employed for the military needs bringing all civil transport to a stand still, all civil life to disorder and chaos. Food, clothing and medicines and agricultural and industrial necessities would accumulate at the production centres, transit of these commodities to cities and villages becoming damned difficult. Entire civil life would break down. Chaos in the rear supply lines would result in defeat of the army on the front irrespective of its large size, experience and up-to-date equipment. Poland, France, Italy and Germany are examples of such defeat during the second world war. The cow economy discussed herein assures well disciplined national civil organisation, non-stop all round production and undisturbed distribution to the relief of the government to concentrate full attention on the war in such an eventuality, because the enemy cannot bombard home to home production centres spread over such a vast area. The cow is the creative atomic power while atom bomb is destructive power of an atom. Power of destruction can be countered only with power of creation. Destruction of fertilizer factories or destruction of railways in times of war, or transport means in total service of defence, any one of these contingencies would result in a total failure of crops and the ensuing defeat on the war front. On the other hand accumulation of huge stocks of fertilizer and industrial products in the factories would create unprecedented financial crisis. Therefore it will be seen that the cow based economy is a guarantee of the safety of our frontiers.
If the cow protects us from the outside invader, she also protects us against the physical enemies, namely diseases, and that to a higher degree. Cow’s milk, ghee and other produce gives immunity from Tuberculosis, Raktapitta, small-pox, dysentery and nearly 105 such diseases. Immunity and treatment of diseases with cow medicines will leave a large surplus of indigenous pharmaceuticals for exchange earning export. Today the cow problem has to be considered not only from milk and hide and skin aspects but from all angles of her use and utilities. Enormous benefits the nation would derive from cow progeny development against her negligible feeding costs.